The Resurrection of Jesus: Apologetics, Polemics, History

The Resurrection of Jesus: Apologetics, Polemics, History

  • Downloads:9301
  • Type:Epub+TxT+PDF+Mobi
  • Create Date:2021-08-23 09:53:47
  • Update Date:2025-09-06
  • Status:finish
  • Author:Dale C. Allison, Jr.
  • ISBN:0567697568
  • Environment:PC/Android/iPhone/iPad/Kindle

Summary

The earliest traditions around the narrative of Jesus' resurrection are considered in this landmark work by Dale C。 Allison, Jr, drawing together the fruits of his decades of research into this issue at the very core of Christian identity。



Allison returns to the ancient sources and earliest traditions, charting them alongside the development of faith in the resurrection in the early church and throughout Christian history。 Beginning with historical-critical methodology that examines the empty tomb narratives and early confessions, Allison moves on to consider the resurrection in parallel with other traditions and stories, including Tibetan accounts of saintly figures being assumed into the light, in the chapter "Rainbow Body"。

Finally, Allison considers what might be said by way of results or conclusions on the topic of resurrection, offering perspectives from both apologetic and sceptical viewpoints。 In his final section of "modest results" he considers scholarly approaches to the resurrection in light of human experience, adding fresh nuance to a debate that has often been characterised in overly simplistic terms of "it happened" or "it didn't"。

Download

Reviews

Jimmy

The best book ever written on the Resurrection。 The most unbiased。 The most learned。 Allison has proven, here, that he is one of the most critical and leading historians on the planet。 Nothing compares to this masterpiece。

David Graieg

Allison’s book The Resurrection of Jesus: Apologetics, Polemics, History is a major revision of his previous chapter “Resurrecting Jesus,” pages 198–375 in his Resurrecting Jesus: The Earliest Christian Tradition and Its Interpreters (London: T&T Clark, 2005)。 The sections on “Confession” (pp。 213–219) and “Doubt’s” (pp。 219–28) from Resurrecting Jesus have been removed (for his updated views, see pages 19–43 of his: Night Comes: Death, Imagination, and the Last Things (Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdman Allison’s book The Resurrection of Jesus: Apologetics, Polemics, History is a major revision of his previous chapter “Resurrecting Jesus,” pages 198–375 in his Resurrecting Jesus: The Earliest Christian Tradition and Its Interpreters (London: T&T Clark, 2005)。 The sections on “Confession” (pp。 213–219) and “Doubt’s” (pp。 219–28) from Resurrecting Jesus have been removed (for his updated views, see pages 19–43 of his: Night Comes: Death, Imagination, and the Last Things (Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 2016)。 Chapters “5。 The Story of the Tomb: Friday” and “6。 The Story of the Tomb: Sunday” of The Resurrection of Jesus are more than twice their former length, and the following chapters are completely new: “1。 Overture,” “7。 Resurrected Holy Ones?”, “8。 Rudolf Pesch Redivivus?”, “10。 Visions: Protests and Proposals,” “12。 Rainbow Body”, “13。 Cessationism and Seeing Jesus,” “14。 Zeitoun and Seeing Mary,” “15。 Some Tenuous Arguments: Apologetical,” “16。 Some Tenuous Arguments: Skeptical,” and “17: Inferences and Competing Stories。”In The Resurrection of Jesus, Allison neither seeks to show, with some assurance, that God raised Jesus from the dead, nor that this was not the case; instead, within the limits of historical criticism, Allison humbly seeks to explore Christianity’s holy of holies topic—the resurrection of Jesus。 As for Allison’s personal beliefs, he states, “I believe that the disciples saw Jesus and that he saw them” (p。 3), but he is of different minds as to what the historian can demonstrate about what actually happened (he argues it is historically reasonable to either believe or disbelieve, p。 353)。 In fact, he thinks the subject is so vast like the sand of the seashore and life is brief; consequently, with humility, he admits that “I have not finished this book but abandoned it” (p。 7)。 The book, nevertheless, is exceedingly well researched and is probably one of the best books on the topic of Jesus’ resurrection。Allison argues that “although the evidence is woefully imperfect, it nonetheless suffices to establish, with a high degree of probability, that some of Jesus’ followers came to believe in his resurrection quite soon after his death” (p。 44)。 He continues, “we have here not just a social memory but likely a historical fact。 Within a week of the crucifixion, something—or some things—happened which Jesus’ friends took to signal his resurrection” (p。 45)。Allison thinks that it is historically likely that “Joseph of Arimathea, a member of the Sanhedrin, buried Jesus, perhaps in a family tomb。 Shortly thereafter, some of Jesus’ female followers found the entrance to that tomb open, his body gone。 After that, likely quite soon after that, at least one of them, Mary Magdalene, had a vision of Jesus。 Sometime later, in Galilee, Peter, probably aware of the story of the empty tomb as well as of Mary’s encounter and presumably her interpretation of it, also believed that he had met Jesus。 Not long after that, the apostle and his companions returned to Jerusalem, where they began to proclaim that God had raised Jesus from the dead。 By that time, additional members of the twelve had become convinced that they, too, had seen their lord, whether in Galilee and/or Jerusalem。 Months or even years after that, something happened to convince members of a large crowd—“more than five hundred,” according to Paul—that they too had beheld Jesus。 Subsequently, Jesus’ brother James made the same claim, and eventually also Paul of Tarsus” (p。 336)。 Note that Allison generally concludes that several parts of the canonical accounts are not likely to be historical, such as Matthew’s mention of the guard at the tomb, or Matthew’s resurrection of many saints (27:51b–53, see chp。 7)。Allison thinks that Jesus, as an apocalyptic prophet, expected the imminent end of the age, and as such predicted suffering and vindication (chp。 8)—a belief the disciples held and hence, such pre-Easter expectations would have primed the disciples for accompanying visions, especially upon encountering the empty tomb。 Allison argues that apparitions (chp。 9) and visions (chp。 10) are relatively widespread, including apparitions/visions, which are experienced through multiple senses by individuals and groups on occasions。 Allison devotes chp。 14 to the sightings of the blessed virgin Mary at Zeitoun in 1968 to thousands, the cause of which Allison remains agnostic。I can’t remember exactly what Allison concludes about why the tomb was empty, but he points out that theft for various reasons, including necromancy (pp。 341–44) were possible (Allison also explores the Buddhist notion of a “rainbow body” namely that a body can shrink and disappear, see chp。 12)。Allison has many more insights, and his scholarship is first-rate, and anyone wanting to engage the academic discussion of Jesus’ resurrection must interact with this book。 。。。more